Land finance invariant property market fire difficult to remove mine_清翼

Land finance in the property market fire to the same Sina Finance opinion leaders column (WeChat public number kopleader) columnist Mo Kaiwei community market regulation policy of the city full of expectations: "hope that the property market fire can be extinguished, the property market fever can be cooling, the entire real estate industry will therefore return to rational and healthy development track. But in my opinion, this idea can not be held for the time being too simple and naive, but at least the expectations are too high. This year, eleven holiday period, the Chinese property market ushered in a new round of tightening regulation tide. Since September 30th to the end of the golden week, Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Suzhou, Hefei and other 19 cities have introduced the property market regulation policy within 8 days. So far, the domestic purchase of the city to expand around 20 (September 8th China News Network). It can be said that this is an extraordinary National Day holiday property market fire burned the city government for many sleepless nights, this wave of burning property "fire extinguished, quell social public opinion and the hearts of grievances, really let the city government with a city, the municipal government is trying to use their brains the exhaust all the skills in the purchase of the property market, have introduced measures to limit credit policy. Now, regardless of how the regulatory policy effect, only the local government resolute attitude deserves praise. The property market regulation policy throughout the 20 city, mainly includes: for the local household registration and non local household registration implement differentiated restriction policy; improve the mortgage down payment and interest rate; further strict restriction, limited credit condition and standard upgrade, cancel the preferential tax; hit third party mortgage platform and so on, these purchase credit limit policy is quite large, especially in Beijing, Shenzhen, Hefei, Suzhou City purchase efforts to recover in 2014 before "9.30". Thus, the community property market regulation policy for these city full of expectations: "hope that the property market fire can be extinguished, the property market fever can be cooling, the entire real estate industry will therefore return to rational and healthy development track. But in my opinion, this idea can not be held for the time being too simple and naive, but at least the expectations are too high. Because a credit limit restriction policy can not jump out of the original administrative regulation "pattern", just a lot of past policy copy, no fresh and effective moves at all; do not rely on market regulation law, the result can not get rid of the control of a die, a place on the chaos of the cycle. In 20 the city regulatory measures, still remain in the credit and the purchase of two means of regulation, there is no real effective market regulation measures, these control policy measures although it may have some effect, but it should not be used for a long time, otherwise it will form a comprehensive "dependency" of a kind of administration, to the final form the property market itself a strong "resistance", the property market regulation never distance Oliver, people will always be in the administrative regulation "bitter struggles.". Since two, the property market has formed a fire, to fire also needs a process, will not be immediate, but can not happen overnight. The formation of the property market "virtual fire" the first and second tier cities)相关的主题文章:

« »

Comments closed.